Planet and energy · 1 min read

At many sites, a dry spring coincided with more photosynthesis

Less spring rain did not always coincide with less photosynthesis. The response depended on water availability: at many sites without strong water limitation, dry springs coincided with greater carbon uptake. The opposite pattern appeared where water was scarce.

How we make these readings

The study, in plain language

Rainfall does not always have the same relationship with plant activity. A team compared long-term carbon-exchange records with rainfall to see what happened during dry springs in different ecosystems.

At many sites where water did not appear to be the main limitation, less rain went along with more photosynthetic carbon uptake. The opposite pattern appeared where water was scarce. Land models did not reproduce the observed spring increase well, unlike satellite products, which also showed the pattern.

The key idea

The relationship between spring rainfall and carbon uptake varied with what most limits plants at each location.

Something to think about

When you hear that drought harms plants, ask where and in which season: the response may depend on whether water or energy is more limiting.

The original study

Increased photosynthesis during spring drought in energy-limited ecosystems

Nature Communications, 14, artículo 7828 (2023) · DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-43430-9. Published .

Study authors (1)

David L. Miller, Sebastian Wolf, Joshua B. Fisher, Benjamin F. Zaitchik, Jingfeng Xiao y Trevor F. Keenan

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43430-9

Source under CC BY 4.0. English adaptation and explanation by PaperFlow, with AI assistance. The text has been reorganized for a general audience; it is not the complete paper and does not imply endorsement by its authors.

One study alone does not represent a field's consensus. Educational content does not replace professional advice. Report a possible error.