Health and movement · 1 min read

Video-supervised exercise improved movement tests, but not blood sugar

Among 33 adults with type 2 diabetes, those who trained remotely improved more on movement and sleep tests. Blood sugar did not differ.

How we make these readings

The study, in plain language

Supervision took place by video while participants did aerobic and strength exercises. Over 12 weeks, a trial in Pelotas, Brazil, compared this approach with no program among adults with type 2 diabetes who did not use insulin and were not regularly active. The people assessing and analyzing the data did not know each participant's group.

The primary measure, which reflects blood sugar over the past few months, showed no convincing difference. Some movement tests favored the remote group: standing up from a chair, arm work, moving around, and completing a step test. Participants also reported improved sleep quality. These were secondary outcomes in a small, single-center study, and several people left the program.

The key idea

Average blood sugar did not change convincingly, but several movement tests and participant-reported sleep favored the training group.

Something to think about

When a study does not change its primary measure, what else changed? Here, blood sugar did not change convincingly, but some movement tests did. The group was small.

The original study

Effects of a Synchronous Telehealth Exercise Program on Clinical, Functional, and Psychosocial Outcomes in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (RED Study): A Randomized Clinical Trial

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 23(6), 773. · DOI 10.3390/ijerph23060773. Published .

Study authors (1)

Samara Nickel Rodrigues; Bruno Veiga Guterres; Maurício Tatsch Ximenes Carvalho; Rodrigo Sudatti Delevatti; Cristine Lima Alberton.

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph23060773

Source under CC BY 4.0. English adaptation and explanation by PaperFlow, with AI assistance. The text has been reorganized for a general audience; it is not the complete paper and does not imply endorsement by its authors.

One study alone does not represent a field's consensus. Educational content does not replace professional advice. Report a possible error.