Economics, work and decisions · 1 min read

As a couple, they preferred to wait for money more than when deciding alone

Among 134 married couples in Vietnam, deciding together was associated with less preference for immediate rewards, but no relationship appeared for actual savings.

How we make these readings

The study, in plain language

Married couples with children from a commune in Vietnam took part in a task that involved choosing between rewards at different times. The team compared each person’s decisions alone with the couple’s joint decisions and asked about income and management of household money.

When deciding with a partner, participants showed less preference for immediate rewards. In the survey, those with a stronger immediate preference gave a smaller share of income to their spouse, were more likely to manage resources, and received a larger share of their partner’s income. By contrast, no relationship appeared for actual saving and accumulation.

The key idea

In the task, couples chose immediate money less often when deciding together, but no relationship appeared with households’ actual savings.

Something to think about

Think about money decisions in your household: which do you make alone and which with someone else? Would you choose the same way in both cases?

The original study

Does marriage work as a savings commitment device? Experimental evidence from Vietnam

PLOS ONE, 14(6), e0217646 · DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0217646. Published .

Study authors (1)

Hisaki Kono; Tomomi Tanaka

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217646

Source under CC BY 4.0. English adaptation and explanation by PaperFlow, with AI assistance. The text has been reorganized for a general audience; it is not the complete paper and does not imply endorsement by its authors.

One study alone does not represent a field's consensus. Educational content does not replace professional advice. Report a possible error.